[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Inferno marketing vs. Java marketing
- To: inferno@interstice.com
- Subject: Re: Inferno marketing vs. Java marketing
- From: Ian Bruce <ianbruce@lucent.com>
I hear you! Obviously there are lots of plans for Inferno and many of them we will not be free to talk about. I'm just an Inferno user, so I don't know their plans either, but I do get the slight advantage of interacting with them on occassion. My impression is if Phil says something its probably going to happen. I really liked your "public styx server" idea though, cause this could happen and be boon to inferno. I really don't get the non-internet, non-web, non-PC message at all. Inferno plays to the internet, web and PC as far as I can see, although I'm not sure I wouldn't use Unix boxes for servers most of the time. The QOS issues are important ones, I will try to remember to push them too. Remember Inferno is a Network Operating System, so it brings some nice namespace and connection abstractions to the table. How it gets used is up to us users. The real power is the ability to build applications which run spread out on the network -- most of this is only meaningful to thin clients like Set Top Boxes. Lots of the things you are looking for will show up I am sure. -- Ian Bruce (630) 713-7387 ian@iexist.flw.lucent.com ianbruce@lucent.com
- Prev by Date: Re: Inferno marketing vs. Java marketing
- Next by Date: Inferno marketing vs. Java marketing -Reply
- Prev by thread: Re: Inferno marketing vs. Java marketing
- Next by thread: Re: Inferno marketing vs. Java marketing
- Index(es):