[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Lucent Technologies & Sun Microsystems
- To: Rob Rodgers <rsrodger@wam.umd.edu>
- Subject: Re: Lucent Technologies & Sun Microsystems
- From: Ian Bruce <ianbruce@lucent.com>
- Cc: gep2@computek.net, inferno@artnet.com.br
- Original-CC: gep2@computek.net, inferno@artnet.com.br
Rob Rodgers wrote: > I like the NC concept -- it's time for a whole new generation to learn > first-hand why time-sharing systems of the late-70s/early-80s were a bad > thing, because people who should know better seem to have forgotten. > > RSR I had the same initial reaction. Didn't we do this before and hasn't the last decade been devoted to moving computing to the edge of the network? Then I realized that the transitor radio seemed silly until you could carry it in a shirt pocket. There are many pluses to networked computing. Like reliability (because we can introduce redundancy) and scalability and mobility. NO, I think the market will love NC -- it is definitely not time-sharing (which by the way was very successful for a time) in the same sense. Of course, its not "free" either. Notice that they cracked some encryption scheme a few months back using all the processors on the campus as a network computer. -- Ian Bruce (630) 713-7387 ian@iexist.flw.lucent.com ianbruce@lucent.com
- Prev by Date: [Fwd: Re: [Fwd: linux inferno woes]]
- Next by Date: Re: Lucent Technologies & Sun Microsystems
- Prev by thread: Re: Lucent Technologies & Sun Microsystems
- Next by thread: Re: Lucent Technologies & Sun Microsystems
- Index(es):