[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Lucent Technologies & Sun Microsystems
- To: gep2@computek.net
- Subject: Re: Lucent Technologies & Sun Microsystems
- From: Rob Rodgers <rsrodger@wam.umd.edu>
- cc: inferno@artnet.com.br
> There is virtually no likelihood that the NC model will succeed. It's too > incompatible, too limited, and the much-ballyhooed cost savings simply aren't > enough to justify the dead-end, limited-function, crippled/brain-dead NC > machine. You forgot "slow" "overpriced" and "server bound." NC systems not only have to overcome using inexpensive, slower commodity processors, almost all of the NC plays beyond MS/Intel involve a VM-like solution to compatibility, putting an already behind-in-performance system even further to the rear. I like the NC concept -- it's time for a whole new generation to learn first-hand why time-sharing systems of the late-70s/early-80s were a bad thing, because people who should know better seem to have forgotten. RSR
- Prev by Date: Re: Lucent Technologies & Sun Microsystems
- Next by Date: udp broadcast in inferno ?
- Prev by thread: Re: Lucent Technologies & Sun Microsystems
- Next by thread: Re: Lucent Technologies & Sun Microsystems
- Index(es):