[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Inferno and UNIX
- To: inferno@artnet.com.br
- Subject: Re: Inferno and UNIX
- From: forsyth@plan9.cs.york.ac.uk
the following message, which appeared on the list late last year, might be of interest in this context. given the state of C programs i've had to import into a Unix environment, i'd say the last sentence is, if anything, a considerable understatement! it's getting harder, too, thanks to those awful configure scripts, and what they imply about the programs they configure. From interstice.com!owner-inferno Mon Dec 9 16:17:12 GMT 1996 From: plan9.bell-labs.com!dmr To: interstice.com!inferno Subject: re: C/C++ compiler? Sender: interstice.com!owner-inferno Precedence: bulk Reply-To: interstice.com!inferno Is there any really big reason why a C and/or C++ compiler couldn't be developed to compile code for Inferno? Obviously, you'd miss out on the benefits of Limbo, but then lots of really useful tools could be ported easily to the Inferno environment. The C language proper could be compiled without undue difficulty into safe Dis code. Probably the crucial realization for the compiler-writer is that a C pointer needs to be represented as an array, and for the C program-writer (or adapter) that the ANSI/ISO standard is more strict in what it promises than most people realize. Some things look tough to do without help from the run-time (setjmp/longjmp), some seem tough (like variadic argument lists) but might yield to careful thought. Some things (like function pointers) aren't visible in Limbo but have been anticipated (at least in stub form) in the interpreter. It would be an interesting exercise, in that it might provide an environment that enforced conformance, even at run time, to the C standard. On the other hand, I'd bet that the X windows server and libraries would be really hard to port. Dennis
- Prev by Date: Re: Inferno and UNIX
- Next by Date: Re: Inferno and UNIX
- Prev by thread: Re: Inferno and UNIX
- Next by thread: Re: Inferno and UNIX
- Index(es):