[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Inferno marketing vs. Java marketing
- To: <inferno@interstice.com>
- Subject: Re: Inferno marketing vs. Java marketing
- From: "Rob Rodgers" <rsrodger@wam.umd.edu>
> Microsoft is fighting the last war This is a common assertion, but beyond sounding catchy when delivered by McNealy and Ellison, it has little merit. It presumes that one can just ignore what's going on in the mass market under the mistaken impression that other markets can ignore it. > Microsoft is very weak when it comes to connecting to the real world Really? In what way? You mean that NT and 95 aren't good clients? You mean that the best browsers come out for other platforms first? > all of MS's attempts to deal with real-world real-time issues such as real > pre-emptive multitasking and predictable I/O interrupt service that will There are lots of opportunities for real time already. Is Inferno really interested in competing with QNX? > However, we once again are faced with the issue of defining what constitutes > a PC platform for the native Inferno to run on On the Lucent home pages, we see the following devices associated with Inferno: PDAs telephones computers laptops Who buys these? RSR
- Prev by Date: Re: Inferno marketing vs. Java marketing -Reply
- Next by Date: Re: Inferno marketing vs. Java marketing
- Prev by thread: Re: Inferno marketing vs. Java marketing
- Next by thread: Re: Inferno marketing vs. Java marketing
- Index(es):