[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: consortium
- To: inferno@interstice.com (inferno)
- Subject: RE: consortium
- From: anssi.porttikivi@research.nokia.com (Porttikivi Anssi NRC/Hki)
>>but should you not give the >>control of the architecture spesification to a public consortium? Don't >>you trust in your professional authority to steer it to the right >>direction, anyway? > >i never really understood the rationale behind this sort of thing. At least Microsoft has decided to try to give an impression that it is "consortiuming" ActiveX. For businesses to decide to invest in Inferno development they need to be sure that the one who controls the technology does not have conflicting interests with them. Guess how willing the competing telecommunications companies are to adopt a Lucent controlled "dial-tone for future networks"!
- Prev by Date: Re: resizing the inferno window
- Next by Date: I want Quake, John and Linus here!
- Prev by thread: consortium
- Next by thread: Limbo questions
- Index(es):