[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Apple
- To: inferno@interstice.com
- Subject: Re: Apple
- From: james.woods@Eng.Sun.COM (James A. Woods)
thus, so far, the possibilities for future macos: (0) rewrite in limbo (1) rewrite in java (2) emulate under beos (3) emulate under nt (4) emulate under mae (now on solaris + hpux) notes: (0) is missing a powermac port; prototypical mass market limbo host is a "sealed" net pc running inferno. (1) now available as a layer on a realtime kernel (os-9); mass market prototypes use javachips and kona. (2)/(3) have the advantage that ports exist for underlying hardware which apple currently sells. (4) porting mae makes for other milieus (sgi irix, ibm aix, etc.); rehosting solaris from to powermac is still possible (but existing powerpc port is other-endian); mae rewritten in limbo, with X replaced by tcl could do much towards #0 apple merger candidates remain those with: (0) money ($5-10 billion) (1) existing weak consumer brand (2) urge to distribute new software to millions. notes: of the announced attempts (ibm, sun, oracle, at&t), sun & oracle have the weak brand, but sun wants telcos to oem java [source -- mcnealy, shareholder meeting]. of unannounced possibilities, sgi has no money, microsoft has antitrust problems as well as lacking #1, some faceless rich foreign combine may have all three, sony & disney are disqualified on brand. lucent *does* make sense, but my ex-boss and former head of apple r&d (david nagel) went to at&t, not lucent. if lucent is rebuffed, a natural choice for a consumer-branded distributor for limbo/inferno/styx machines must surely be virgin i.e. richard branson's empire (airline, cola, vodka, internet service). tagline: inside every virgin boils an inferno --jaw
- Prev by Date: Re: some dumb questions
- Next by Date: RE: some dumb questions
- Prev by thread: Re: Apple
- Next by thread: Re: Apple
- Index(es):