re: database services

[philw@plan9.bell-labs.com]

It would probably make more sense to build file
trees representing the content or structure rather
than putting everything under /dev/database. I
am not advocating representing the tables or
content in the file tree, rather the control
structures that might be appropriate to specific
access methods.

I think it would be worth while putting a kit to
build more complex file systems than are available
through file2chan as someone suggested yesterday.
I see no reason why it should not be written in
limbo.

phil

---

• Prev by Date: database services
• Next by Date: re: Remote on Win95
• Prev by thread: database services
• Next by thread: fcall interface
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread