[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Info?
- To: inferno@interstice.com
- Subject: Re: Info?
- From: "Chris D. DeLashmutt" <itdcd2@leaseplan.com>
>>Novell is admiting failure on thier own NEST product if they support >>JavaTel. > > big companies have many divisions and also hedge their bets. > > more depressing is that we end up with yet another interface. > someday we'll rediscover abstraction. It would be nice if companies would adhere to an abstract standard so that, with minor modifications, most any objects could communicate with each other. But this is not a NICE world, because you have companies like IBM who, it seems, have two rules: 1. If there is a standard, break it and make up your own. 2. If there is no standard, make up your own and don't release any information on it. > for instance, if i see yet another RFC describing a protocol that > implements a mangled name space, badly, i'll scream. > there must be dozens of the half-baked things by now. Yeesh! Name space....how many different ways can we implement that one..... Chris =================================================== Chris DeLashmutt --Lease Plan USA, Inc. --http://www.leaseplan.com --chris@leaseplan.com --Member of the Internet Developer's Association Murphy's Laws of Combat: 30: If you take more than your fare share of objectives, you will have more than your fair share of objectives to take. ===================================================
- Prev by Date: Re: Info?
- Next by Date: Telephony/Inferno 1.0 etc..
- Prev by thread: Re: Info?
- Next by thread: Telephony/Inferno 1.0 etc..
- Index(es):