[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Inferno release date
- To: inferno@interstice.com
- Subject: Re: Inferno release date
- From: Alex Carr <acarr@clam.com>
- Cc: acarr@clam.com
forsyth writes: > i don't understand this killer-app requirement. why should killerapps be any > more necessary or desirable than killer bees? The reason, I think, that having a killer-app is desirable is quite simplly to help to enusre that it is a success. While a killer-app is not likely to be a requirement it certainly would help to make Inferno more desirable and that of course would give it greater market share in less time. Unix took quite a while to make it to the main stream market. DOS and Windows took much less time and grabbed singnificantly more market share in that time. They both had killer Apps. We all know how much market share OS2 has grabbed. No one had heard of Java until it got tied to a web browser. To me Inferno is still vaporware. I see and hear much about it but I have yet to be able to lay my hands on it and try it out. I am very much awaiting the opportunity to try it out. It sounds very promising. If and when I do get my hands on it I will likely tinker with it. If after all the oohs and ahhs are over, I find that it is only useful to play and tinker with, then I will probably not pay it any significant attention. I may continue to tinker around with it but in the long run I'll probably continue to do real work on UNIX or Windows. If Inferno is simply trying to be a better Java then I doubt it will go anywhere at all. On the other hand there are numerous applications that are in sore need of a serious, light weight, and powerful distributed OS that is not tied to a particulary architecture. We need a general (open) OS that can run on embedded systems so that we can produce those smart toasters and alarm clocks. Of course we also need standards so that my smart alarm clock can tell the smart toaster to have the toast ready for me no matter when I wake up. I'm being overly cute and simplistic but you get the point. This does not mean that Lucent should be busy trying to come up with a killer-app to release with Inferno. That would be folly. One cannot dictate what will be a killer-app. It takes a Steve Jobs to look at technolgy, realize that it is "Insanely Great" and instantly see how invaluable it would be as a platform and then goes out and come up with that killer-app. (Sorry about the Jobs reference, I've been watching that PBS speacial "Triumph of the Nerds" again.) For myself, I'm just hoping that Inferno is what I think it is. As I mentioned above, that would be a small distributed OS that I could even run on an embedded system. Being able to run on top of other popular OS's is great becuase that means I am much more likely to be able to use my current development tool set. Then maybe I can be the one to come up with the next killer-app. (Any venture capitalists on this mailing list? Didn't think so.) Anyway, that my two cents. Alex
- Prev by Date: Inferno On The ARM Processor.
- Next by Date: Re: Inferno release date
- Prev by thread: Re: Inferno release date
- Next by thread: Re: Inferno release date
- Index(es):