[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Threads
- To: inferno@interstice.com
- Subject: Threads
- From: Rogers Cadenhead <rogers@prefect.com>
- Reply-To: inferno@interstice.com
- Sender: owner-inferno@inter2.interstice.com
At 01:10 AM 7/5/96 -0500, porttiki@research.nokia.com (Porttikivi Anssi NRC/Hki) wrote: >programmers don't feel tempted to bypass it. As always, >hardest work with Inferno has probably been designing >things out: no threading, C++ like objects >or a microkernel - no buzzword compliance. If I read correctly, Limbo supports the spawning of independently scheduled threads of control, and the means is implemented for communication between tasks of this kind. On another note, why are you so excited about Inferno? Do you see it as Java with a robust, network-centric OS already built into it? Rogers Cadenhead
- Prev by Date: Inferno advocacy
- Next by Date: Limbo manual released
- Prev by thread: Inferno advocacy
- Next by thread: Limbo manual released
- Index(es):